AIMS Charter
AIMS Charter by High Intent Digital
Home / Policy Pack
Free AI Risk Snapshot Log in
📚 Steal Our Homework

Save thousands on AI consulting fees. Seven AI policies for less than one billable hour. $39.

Seven board-defensible policies. Five bonuses. Same templates AIMS Charter uses on paid engagements. Editable in Word and Google Docs, aligned to NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001.

The next vendor security questionnaire typically lands within 4 to 6 weeks. The Pack lands in 60 seconds.
Where the pack is sent. Leave it blank and Stripe will ask at checkout.
Stripe checkout · Word + Google Docs friendly · Instant download
For CTOs, CISOs, and marketing leaders

If your team is shipping AI faster than your governance program can catch up, here are three risks you may not have priced in yet.

Up to two-thirds of CIOs and CTOs are already accountable for AI systems they do not fully control. Marketing owns most of the spend. The exposure lands on both desks.

1

Your team is putting proprietary and customer data into AI tools right now.

Customer lists, segmentation, competitive intel, budget numbers, campaign strategy, unreleased product info. Most consumer AI terms of service may allow the vendor to train on those prompts unless you are on a specific enterprise plan. You likely have no inventory of what your team uploaded this week.

Samsung banned consumer AI company-wide after internal leaks. State privacy laws (CCPA, CPRA, TX, CO, VA, CT) now require disclosure of automated data processing.

2

AI-generated marketing content can create legal exposure you may not see until it is too late.

Fabricated statistics, hallucinated competitor claims, copyright-infringing images, trademark violations in generated copy. The moment AI-generated content crosses a line, marketing owns it. Not the AI vendor.

Air Canada was held legally liable for its chatbot's promises to a customer. FTC Endorsement Guides updated 2023 and actively enforced. Getty v. Stability AI and NYT v. OpenAI setting new precedent.

3

Every enterprise questionnaire now has an AI section. When it lands, someone has to answer it this week.

Vendor security questionnaires now ask "how do you govern AI use?" SOC 2 auditors are sampling AI policy language. Cyber renewals are adding AI-use exclusions. Without a documented policy, deals can stall at security review, renewals can narrow, and the board question lands on whoever is nearest.

The average vendor spends up to 179 hours per month responding to security questionnaires (Whistic, 2025 TPRM Impact Report). Only 36% of organizations have an AI policy in place or in progress (Vanta, State of Trust 2025).

A $39 template pack does not close all three risks. But it names them, defends the first move, and puts the artifacts in your team's hands today. The seven policies plus five bonuses below are the editable, framework-aligned baseline your legal team can start reviewing this week, not next quarter.

What's in the Pack

1

AI Acceptable Use Policy

What your team can and can't do with LLMs. Approved content categories, prohibited content, prompt hygiene basics. Employee-facing.

2

AI Data Handling in LLMs

Which data classes are safe in which tools. Retention. Deletion. Sub-processor rules. The document your CFO forwards to your CTO.

3

AI Vendor Evaluation Framework

20 questions to ask any AI vendor before signing. Scoring rubric. Template scorecard. Legal + procurement can share it.

4

AI Incident Response & SLA

2 / 10 / 15 day SLA aligned to EU AI Act Article 73. Incident register template. Escalation matrix. Reads like a security incident policy your CISO already recognizes.

5

Contractor / Freelancer AI Addendum

Attach it to your MSA. Attestation form included. Legal-review-ready contract clause.

6

AI-Assisted Decision-Making Policy

For regulated use cases: hiring, lending, insurance, healthcare. Covers Colorado AI Act + EU AI Act Article 6 conformity language.

7

Board-Level AI Governance Charter

One-page executive summary template. The doc your CEO walks the board through when the question comes up.

+

Implementation Checklists

One per policy. 35 checkboxes across the seven documents. Print + walk your team through.

+

Board Briefing Deck Template

12 Google Slides. Walks a CxO through their new AI posture. Editable, presentable, board-ready.

+

Fill-in-the-Blank Cheat Sheet

Every yellow-highlighted variable across all seven policies mapped to one page. Fill it in once and paste across.

+

Framework Alignment Matrix

Every policy mapped to NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 clauses, EU AI Act articles, and the Colorado AI Act. The row you drop into any RFP response.

+

Import Guide

Two-minute walkthrough on getting these into your Google Drive as editable Docs your legal team can annotate.

Every policy aligned to
NIST AI RMF + GenAI Profile ISO/IEC 42001 EU AI Act Bridge Colorado AI Act ISO/IEC 27001 (referenced)

What this pack is (and what it isn't)

Is: A polished, editable, framework-aligned starting point that saves your legal team a week of drafting time. Same voice, same structure, same clauses AIMS Charter uses on paid engagements.

Is not: A substitute for a legal review by your own counsel. An attestation. A compliance guarantee. A promise that pasting these into your handbook makes you audit-ready.

Compared to your alternatives: Outside counsel drafting seven AI policies from scratch typically runs illustrative $8,000 to $25,000 and takes four to six weeks. Waiting until the next customer questionnaire lands can run the risk of a stalled deal at security review. This Pack lands in your inbox in about a minute, for $39, ready for your legal team to review this week.

Read them, fill in the yellow highlights, run them past your counsel, publish them. If you want the ongoing operating system that attests, versions, alerts, and reports on these policies month over month, that is AIMS Charter Core at $99/mo. Not required. Recommended if you are being asked to prove enforcement.

Why the AI question keeps landing on your desk

AI adoption is outpacing AI governance. The Pack starts closing the gap this afternoon.

Two-thirds
of CIOs and CTOs are accountable for AI systems they do not fully control.
IBM Institute for Business Value, AI Control Gap Study (June 2026) · n = 2,000 CIOs and CTOs across 33 countries · newsroom.ibm.com
Only 36%
of organizations have an AI policy in place or in progress.
Vanta, State of Trust 2025 (January 2025) · n = 3,500 IT and business leaders across five markets · vanta.com

Answer the next AI question with a defensible document.

Seven board-defensible AI policies plus five bonuses, aligned to NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001. Your legal team can review them this week for the price of one billable hour.

Give me my seven policies for $39 →
Jumps back to the form at the top of the page · Stripe checkout · Instant download